Where is the Ark of the Covenant? What happened to it? Where did it go?
Ark just means “box,” whether it’s Noah’s box or Moses’ box. Noah’s box was huge. Moses’ box was smaller, made of wood and gold, — 3′ 9″ by 2′ 3″ — smaller than a footlocker. It held the stone tablets on which were written the Ten Commandments. Writing on tablets was quite common 3,000 years ago. The ark travelled with the Israelites in the wilderness, residing in the Tabernacle Tent until Solomon built a home for it: the first Temple, Solomon’s Temple.
Then suddenly, inexplicably it just disappeared. No explanation. No songs of lament in the Scriptures.
The disappearance of the Ark is a mystery in the Bible. The Ark is mentioned 200 times until the time of Solomon and then suddenly, never again. Stone silence, if you’ll pardon the pun.
My favorite movie suggesting a fantastic possibility is Raiders of the Lost Ark.” Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones races around trying to keep the Ark from the Nazis. In the end he accomplishes nothing. If he had done nothing at all, if he had stayed home, the outcome would have been the same: The Nazis would have opened the Ark and been fried to death, just as they were anyway. But I digress.
Some say Nebuchadnezzar’s armies destroyed it when they burned Jerusalem in 587 BC. From the Scriptural account, however, it seems to have dropped off the map much earlier — hundreds of years earlier.
Ethiopian tradition has another explanation. In Kings and Chronicles we read of the Queen of Sheba (Saba in some traditions) visiting Solomon. Ethiopian tradition holds that Solomon got the queen pregnant. Years later their son Menelik returned to meet his father. He returned with the Ark, which rests in a guarded chapel to this day. This tradition was transmitted orally until the 13th century when is was written in a document called the Kebra Nagast, “The Glory of Kings.” It is written in Ge’ez, an ancient language that preceded Amharic.
Above: An old document written in Ge’ez, kept at the Axum Cathedral.
Former missionary and Water to Thrive Ambassador Jim Sorensen (Pastor Lenae Sorensen’s wife), invited me to read The Sign and the Seal by Graham Hancock. This book spells out the story of the Ark in a kind of da Vinci Code fashion.
Hancock notes that the Queen of Sheba is depicted on the south porch of the 12th century Chartres Cathedral. The south porch with its statues was added in the first part of the 13th century when the Kebra Nagast was written. Why is she included among the many statues of Israel’s Kings? She appears only two times in Scripture where she seems to arrive and leave a pagan. Why include her?
There is a second statue of the Queen of Sheba on the north porch of the Cathedral. Here she is a full-sized statue, with a black slave crouching at her feet. An Ethiopian?
On one of the arches of the north pith is carved a box being transported by ox cart. Beneath it is carved ARCHIS CEDERIS, “The Ark of the Covenant.” Later there is another quote that has been worn out, but appear to say, “The Ark sent away.” Did the architects of the Cathedral know the Ethiopian tradition?
Hancock goes on to equate the Holy Grail with the Ark of the Covenant. While later the grail was assumed to be the cup, the earliest written accounts, like Parzifal, written sometime between 1195 and 1210, it is portrayed as a colored, glowing stone. The Ten Commandments were considered stones from the heavens. In The Jewish Encyclopedia, Menachem Haran suggests the Ark held a meteorite from Mount Sinai that made Moses’ face glow. Ancient Semitic tribes revered stones that fell from heaven, as the holy Muslim Black Stone at the Kaaba in Mecca. Greeks and Romans also believed stones that fell from heaven possessed divine life.
Talmudic sources said the Holy of Holies in Solomon’s Temple was dark. There was no light, except the divine light emitted from the Ark. It emitted a “dazzling radiance.”
Anyway, Hancock posits the Grail was the Ark, with either a holy luminescent stone from the heavens or holy stone tablets from the heavens. Later the tradition of the Grail was Christianized. As the Ark had held the old covenant, now the cup held the new covenant. This the ark became a cup. The mysterious thing the ancients had been on a quest to find was none other than the Ark of the Covenant. What if the Ark was transferred from Jerusalem to a sanctuary chapel in Axum, maybe to keep the presence of God safe from foreign invaders? The Romans said Axum was the greatest city in Ethiopia. The emperor was said to be highly educated and proficient in Greek. Perhaps it was a place safe from Assyrians and Babylonians.
Ethiopian Orthodox Christians, some of the oldest Christian churches in the world, hold the Ark of the Covenant in high regard. In fact, they have a tradition no other Christian church has: Every Ethiopian Orthodox church has a tabot or mini-ark, a miniature replica of the ark of the Covenant blessed by the Patriarch whenever a new church is built. It is kept in a small tabernacle at the altar, in the Holy of Holies, where only the priest may go. Why? Although these tabots are never allowed to be seen by the laity, you can nevertheless see several in the British Museum, where they rest after being pilfered from Ethiopia. Think the size of a cigar box.
Is the Ark of the Covenant in a small chapel in Axum, a stones throw from the Axum Cathedral? Every Ethiopian I met believed so. The chapel has been guarded as long as anyone can remember by Guardian who is the only person allowed to enter the chapel.
Certainly something is in there, something believed to be the Ark and the stones. As I stood before the chapel this week think about it, I wondered, “What if?”
Above: The Axum Cathedral inside and out. This Ethiopian Orthodox cathedral was built in 1960’s by Haile Silassie to replace the crumbling older cathedral.
Above: To the right of the Axum Cathedral are three smaller chapels, one of which is said to hold the Ark of the Covenant. As I wondered, letting my imagination fly, storm clouds eerily began to form over the chapels…
May 21, 2014 at 10:24 am
Cool story. Thx for sharing it along with all the pics this week from your trip. Looks like it has been meaningful. Prayers for a safe return.
May 21, 2014 at 10:36 am
You’re welcome. Thx 4 reading.
May 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm
fun read! I’ve heard vague stories about this but never this much detail. What if indeed!
May 21, 2014 at 9:49 pm
Bishop, yes! I believe the Ark is there! I can’t wait for the next “changing” of the Guardian, who will for certain, come and verify the contents. Do you know what happened to the pieces of the original stone tablets? Now, there is a story…. Safe travel back. We have much to discuss when you return! -Gigee
May 22, 2014 at 4:10 am
What happened to the crushed tablets?
Did they just remain on the edge of Mount Sinai? Of course not! They contained the handwriting of God. They could’t simply be left behind.
When Moses returned to the top of Mount Sinai to receive the second set of tablets, he picked up the shattered remains of the first. He placed both the new and shattered also tablets in the Ark of the Covenant, which the Israelites carried with them in the wilderness.
Why It Matters, the shattered tablets symbolized where the Israelites had been. The new set represented where they were going. They carried both sets with them on their journey.
I also see the two tablets as a metaphor for our lives. The broken and the whole live together. They both shape who we are. No life is perfect. We have our highs and lows, our moments of shattered pieces and of divine inspiration.
Together they make us a human being, created in the image of God. Together they make us holy.
May 22, 2014 at 4:43 am
Is the Ark of the Covenant in Axum?
According to Ethiopian tradition, the Ark of the Covenant is preserved in the ancient holy city of Aksum. For centuries, the great relic was kept in the Church of Mary of Zion, where the emperor Iyasu is recorded as having seen it and spoken to it in 1691. Now it is kept in the Chapel of the Tablet, which was built beside the church during the reign of the last emperor Haile Selassie. The relic is entrusted to a single guardian, who burns incense before it and recites the Biblical Book of Psalms. No one else can approach it, including the high priest of Axum. The guardian is not only a monk, but a virgin as well, and he serves the Ark until he appoints a successor as his own death approaches.
The classic account of the Ark in Ethiopia is found in a medieval epic written in Geez, The Glory of Kings (in Amharic: Kibre Negest). It describes how the Queen of Sheba had heard that King Solomon possessed great wisdom, and traveled to Jerusalem so that she could learn to govern her own people more wisely. When she arrived, Solomon was impressed by her intelligence as well as her beauty. He began to hope that he might have a child by her, although the epic is anxious to tell its readers that the king was not driven by lust, but by a plan to fill the earth with sons who would be serve the God of Israel. The queen did conceive a son, and after he had grown he set out from Ethiopia to visit his father. Solomon anointed him as king of Ethiopia, and then instructed the elders of Israel to send their own sons to Africa to serve him as counselors. Because the young Israelites were desperately unhappy that they would never see Jerusalem and its Temple again, they decided to carry the Ark with them. In fact, The Glory of Kings tells us that the Ark itself had decided to leave Jerusalem because the Jews had abandoned the faith that God had revealed to them.
The epic provides a history for two essential themes of the medieval Solomonic dynasty: the descent of the royal family from King Solomon, and the presence of the Ark of the Covenant as proof of the sanctity of the Ethiopian state. One of the great mysteries of this epic was when it was written, and when the tradition of the Ark in Ethiopia began. We know from the evidence of coins and inscriptions that the ancient kings of Axum were pagan until the 4th century A.D., when they converted to Christianity. There is no evidence that they claimed descent from King Solomon or that they were especially interested in the Ark of the Covenant. The earliest report that the Ark had been brought to Ethiopia appears at the end of the 12th century, when an Armenian named Abu Salih wrote in Arabic at Cairo that the Ethiopians possessed the Ark of the Covenant, and that it was carried by a large number of Israelites descended from the family of King David, who were white and red in complexion and had blond hair. While popular writers have claimed that Abu Salih is clearly stating that the Ark was carried by a mysterious band of Europeans rather than by Ethiopians, his account cannot be interpreted in this way. In the Song of Solomon, we read that Solomon possessed white and red cheeks and hair like fine gold. Abu Salih seems to be relying on the authority of the Bible to describe a people that he had never seen himself but who were said to be related to the kings of Israel.
Perhaps the most remarkable feature of the Ark that Abu Salih describes is its decoration. Crosses would be a very unusual feature for an ancient Israelite Ark, although medieval Christian artists did often assume that if Christianity were the true faith the Ark would quite naturally have displayed its central symbol. If his account is reliable, it would seem that Abu Salih is describing a later Christian Ark. Even though an ancient wooden box could have survived in the dry air of a sealed Egyptian tomb, the humidity of the Ethiopian rainy season would be very damaging. The question therefore arises of whether an Ark might have decayed in Ethiopia, but the stone Tablets of Moses for which the Ark of the Covenant had been made would survive unharmed. In fact, the earliest accounts by foreign travelers in Ethiopia refer to a Tablet rather than an Ark, and the research undertaken for the recent book published by Roderick Grierson and Stuart Monro-Hay has revealed that the clergy at Axum also describe the great relic as a Tablet rather than an Ark. They use the word sellat, which means ‘tablet’, rather than tabot, which could mean either ‘ark’ or ‘tablet’.
The ambiguity of the word tabot has made the question of the Ark in Ethiopia very difficult to understand. Not only is it used for the Ark of the Covenant in the Old Testament, it is also used for the Tablet at Axum, and for the tens of thousands of altar tablets in every Ethiopian church. Each of these altar stones, on which the sacraments of the Christian liturgy are consecrated, is believed to be a replica of the Ark. In fact, each one is believed actually to be the Ark. This has meant that foreign travelers in Ethiopia have often understood Ethiopians to be talking about the Ark of the Covenant described in the Old Testament when they are really speaking about a tabot in a local church. The rich symbolism that surrounds the tabot and the Ethiopian traditions about the Ark is a source of mystical inspiration for the Ethiopian church in the liturgy, and especially during the great processions such as Timkat, Christmas or Hedar Tsion, festivals that commemorate the Baptism of Christ in January and the arrival of the Ark in November. It is this tradition of profound spirituality that is the key to understanding the nature of Ethiopian (we) claims about the Ark.
While sacred stones marking the covenant between God and man have survived in Mecca for at least sixteen centuries, and while there is no reason why an ancient stone tablet could not have survived at Axum as well, the clergy in Axum clearly believe that more than one Tablet or Ark can be the real and true Ark. As a careful reading of the Hebrew and Greek versions of the Bible also reveals evidence of more than one Ark, the Ethiopian tradition should not be thought to be impossible or incredible. It seems that the Ark really is at Axum, but in a way that is more surprising than most writers on the subject have assumed.
June 3, 2014 at 9:30 am
Alem: Thanks for the helpful response.
Jim Sorensen